[Skip to content]

IPA logo
IPA logo text
Text Size:A A A
Search our Site
 
 

A monthly email bulletin of the latest IPA news and analysis delivered straight to your inbox.

» Subscribe to the IPA e-bulletin

 
 

Would you like the chance to win £100? Help us by completing this short survey on the current industrial relations climate and on the level of negotiation skills existent within your organisation and you could be a winner!

 
 
  • Consultancy and Training Services

    The IPA offers a full range of support services for organisations facing the challenges of change and seeking competitive advantage though workforce engagement
  • Clients

    The IPA works with clients of all sizes and in all sectors
     
  • Publications

    Case studies, research reports and best practice guides, plus the monthly IPA Bulletin
  • Research

    Underpining the IPA's consultancy and training services with robust research programmes
  • Events

    IPA events are topical, practical and provide a unique networking opportunity. Some are free to attend!
.

Bank of Ireland employee forum drives engagement agenda

Bank of Ireland employee forum drives engagement agenda

[ Zoom ]
Fact box

 

13th January 2010


Employee forums, along with the businesses in which they work, are constantly evolving. The challenge is to ensure that the forum remains relevant and engaged in the changes that are taking place, effectively bringing an informed employee voice to bear on the decision making process. Clare Mears, chair of the Partners’ Council, the Bank of Ireland employee forum, identified the need to bring the forum closer to the heart of the business when she took on the role in 2007. By introducing an employee audit tool, owned and operated by the forum, the Partners’ Council have been able to identify the main issues that face the staff in a very challenging environment.


In 2007 we in Partners’ Council saw things changing rapidly in our business. As the world was heading for recession, it became evident that our business in the UK needed to contract. In this turbulent environment, the Council was having less impact than it could, staff were afraid to bring issues forward, and  our structure was no longer aligned to the business. We realised that we needed to raise awareness of what the Council could do for both staff and the business. We have several different businesses in Bank of Ireland UK, each with their own employee forum, and as full-time chair, I wanted to improve consistency and cooperation across the forums.

To revitalise the Partners’ Council we ran an awareness campaign, we got out to our main buildings and ran a series of clinics and attended as many staff meetings as we could. Through the campaign and discussions at the UK Partners’ Council Chairs meetings, we identified a number of ways in which the Partners’ Council could improve its impact and influence. There was opportunity and the need for:

·    Improved communication between Partners’ Council and the business
·    Increased Partners’ Council involvement and higher profile with managers
·    Contribution of Partners’ Council in increasing engagement of UK employees

Following discussion with our CEO, the Partners’ Council explored the suitability of introducing a Partners’ Council Barometer; an audit tool designed to gauge employee engagement and identify issues that might affect employee wellbeing and performance. Through consultation with key stakeholders including Business Managers, HR Business Partners and Internal Communications, we concluded that it would be an effective way to meet the needs identified.

Objectives


The Key Objectives for the barometer were:

1.    To give managers an employee temperature check which is independent from line management, measurable and comparable over time.

2.    To be a simple, consistent feedback method to all managers with UK employees, which can be used to benefit the business at a local or strategic level.

3.    To give Partners’ Council Reps and Chairs an effective and recognised mechanism for raising important collective issues or suggestions quickly.

4.    To be relevant to the business by aligning feedback areas with business strategy.

5.    To address some of the main themes raised by Employee Engagement, whilst not being directly linked with the survey (budget constraints have prevented a survey this year which has meant a greater importance has been placed on the Barometer)

It remains hugely important for staff to own employee engagement feedback of any kind – we need our feedback to be open and honest for it to work. Our Barometer facilitates this as we have buy in from managers all across the business. We would like to continue to develop this and possibly formally become the ‘employee engagement’ measurement tool for our business – thus making a massive financial saving for the business. We are very well placed to really give the business a totally open and honest view – we ensure that we have fully engaged reps in all areas to help us with this.

Feedback Areas

It was agreed that there should be a maximum of five feedback areas, in order to keep the Barometer simple to use and interpret.  Following discussion with the chairs of each of the UK Partners’ Councils and key stakeholders the five feedback areas were decided as:

1.    Involvement
2.    Resources
3.    Communication
4.    Employment
5.    Wellbeing

These areas are all within the Partners’ Council remit as defined under the Partners’ Council Constitution, and having researched through past Partners’ Council minutes, the vast majority of issues raised would fall into one of these categories. From the business’ perspective, all of these areas relate to employee engagement, and the ability of the Partners’ Council to provide objective evidence and analysis on this subject is valuable for their understanding of the workforce.

How it works


Each area of the business has their own Barometer. This is updated monthly by the representatives and presented to the various heads of the business for agreement/discussion before the Group Chair presents an overall Group Barometer to the relevant CEO.

The representatives use various ways of getting the feedback – this can be a constant challenge. It can be done by seeking feedback via email or attending staff meetings for example. Certainly where there is a large geographical spread of units/staff it works best by adopting a ‘buddy’ system whereby reps nominate a contact person in each unit/department to gather the feedback on their behalf on a regular basis – this person would have to be someone who can reach all the staff in that particular area eg: the compliance officer in each branch

Areas of the business where the Barometer shows there are issues then agree an action plan with the representative which is reviewed regularly to show progress. Historical results will highlight where a particular ‘Hot Spot’ needs further action.

 General Indicators


Each of the feedback areas is given a red, amber or green status, depending on the potential business impact. A green status for a feedback area means that there is either no issues raised or positive feedback was gathered and there is no negative impact on the business. Red, on the other hand, indicates a number of issues raised during the consultation with the representatives, and the likelihood that if left unchecked, there will be a considerable business impact.

In addition to the three traffic light colours, the barometer includes a gold feedback status which reflects positive feedback. A gold status can be given where, instead of negative comments, there are numerous positive comments being raised and there is general feeling across the whole constituency that there is true best practice in this area. I must confess it is rather hard to get anyone to put this down – perhaps in better times ahead!

Below is a guide of general indicators. This is the basic overview of the feedback structure; representatives use this tool in conjunction with the further feedback area guidance to assess the ‘temperature’ of the workforce and give structured feedback.


Feedback structure





































Further Feedback Area guidance


The further feedback area guidance is designed to support representatives to gather the relevant information under each of the feedback areas; involvement, resources, communication, employment and wellbeing. As well as helping representatives to focus their feedback on the areas where the Partners’ Council has an agreed remit, it also gives a clear indication of the benchmarks of good practice for representatives to measure performance against.

So, for example, under the involvement feedback area, representatives are advised to measure employee feedback from managers in the following context:

‘Employee feedback - There will regularly be issues where managers will make decisions without employee involvement and Partners’ Council Reps acknowledge that it is a manager’s role to manage their department. Good employee involvement in these cases is where the manager gives reasons why the decision has been made, details of what other options were considered and there is an opportunity to ask questions.’

As well as establishing benchmarks, the guidance also sets expectations as to the level of feedback to ensure that the issues being raised are of a level that is relevant to senior management. Feedback on individual or technical issues is explicitly to be avoided, in favour of the identification of group or systemic issues that may have a noticeable impact on the business. An example of this is taken from the resources feedback area, which gathers feedback on whether staff have the means to carry out their job effectively;

‘If there are systems issues raised, they need to be of a collective nature rather than individual – for example, about the escalation process or general service, not about isolated technical problems.’

Assessment of progress so far


The Partners’ Council are now working in partnership with the business. Staff feel they can bring their issues to the Partners’ Council and can actually make a difference to their working environment. Of course some things cannot change, but much can, and Bank of Ireland are keen to ensure their staff are working in the best possible environment. Partners’ Council reps recognise the strength of the collective voice and the importance of honest and open feedback. They also realise that it must be a true and fair reflection of the majority of staff and that it can be difficult to get feedback from staff. The Barometer is a good tool but will only work well if it is constantly on everyone’s agenda and if feedback is a two-way process. It is therefore important that staff see results. We have seen improvements in areas that used the Barometer.

We would love to see every department in Bank of Ireland using the Barometer as a temperature check and will continue to work towards this.

Conclusion


We have come a long way since 2007 against a backdrop of turbulence and considerable change in financial services. The work we are involved throughout this time can be really meaningful and rewarding – we can actually influence our business, we do play a hugely important part in supporting our colleagues. I am very proud of the Partner’s Council, my first two years as full time chair has been hugely challenging and rewarding. To now hear management & staff refer to ‘The Barometer’ in staff meetings across our business is a great achievement. We have certainly achieved our original objectives.

We are the voice of the staff and we need to use it wisely.


Clare Mears is Chair of the UK Partners’ Council at Bank of Ireland Group