• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Involvement & Participation Association Homepage

Raising Performance through Workplace Engagement
Contact us
  • About IPA
    • Who are IPA?
    • Our Team
      • The IPA Team
      • Our Work Insight Network
    • Jobs
    • History
    • Report and accounts
    • Contact Us
  • What we do
    • Overview of services
    • Strengthening Employment Relations
    • Learning & Development
      • Learning and development programmes
      • Training for Managers
      • Training for Representatives
    • Diagnostic reviews
    • Election Services
    • Speak at events
  • Evidence & Research
    • What is Employee Voice?
      • Making the case for employee voice
      • Employee Voice Hub
    • What is Employee Engagement?
      • Making the case for engagement
    • Collaborative Working
    • Why is diversity, equality and inclusion important?
    • Research Publications
    • Factsheets
    • Case Studies
    • Podcasts
  • IPA Membership
    • Corporate Membership
  • News & Events
    • News
    • Events

Ethnicity Pay Reporting

‘No excuses’.

That was the blunt verdict of the influential Women and Equalities Committee in the House of Commons when they published the report from their review of ethnicity pay reporting at the start of February. Their earlier investigation had highlighted the deeply unequal impact of the pandemic on BAME people, as well as women and disabled people, health and wealth-wise. According to its chair Conservative MP Caroline Nokes, ‘The pandemic has sharpened the focus on pre-existing inequalities for BAME people across a range of policy areas…now is the time to tackle the inequalities.”

‘No excuses’. For the government for not making ethnicity pay reporting (EPR) mandatory, following the success of their annual publication requirement for gender pay gaps, (introduced in 2017). And almost four years now after their consultation on the issue showed overwhelming support for compulsory EPR from across the political spectrum and all sides of industry. According to CIPD’s  CEO Peter Cheese in 2018, ‘The CIPD highlights the need for organisations to be more transparent about how they report on ethnicity… as a catalyst for creating more diverse, inclusive workplaces’.

This support has undoubtedly been intensified by the Black Lives Matter movement and following the murder of George Floyd, with a parliamentary petition proposing mandatory EPR rapidly attracting more than 130,000 signatories.

And ‘no excuses’ for employers for not publishing their data anyway, whether or not they are compelled to. As PwC state in their data-analysis-rich annual diversity report ‘The transparency and accountability that our diversity metrics bring – including our pay gap data – is crucial in driving equity and fairness across our firm.’ Their analysis for example, shows that holding other factors such as education level constant, non-UK born ethnic minority staff are still paid on average more than 10% less than their equivalent white employees.

Most UK employers wouldn’t have a clue as to whether this was happening or not, never mind about how they might go about fixing such pay injustice. You can only act if you understand the problem.

Read more.

Contact us for more information.

Sign up for our newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

In partnership with

Involvement & Participation Association (IPA) is part of the Institute for Employment Studies (IES) a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales under number 931547 and registered as a charity number 258390

Home

About

Contact us

Registered office: Citygate, 185 Dyke Road, Brighton BN3 1TL | Privacy | Accessibility | Cookies

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}